#django-sprint

Feb. 24th, 2010

19:39 Alex_Gaynor
daniellindsley: this is what ericflo did while we were kill -9ing zombies
19:40 matt_c
overachiever.
19:40 daniellindsley thinks the code looks pretty decent.
19:41 daniellindsley
Kinda jealous even.
19:42 ericflo
no stealing my bitbucket session key :)
19:42 ericflo
(we hard-coded that because they cache feeds for anonymous users for 15 mins)
19:48 jezdez
hah!
19:48 Alex_Gaynor
c-c-c-cahing fail
19:50 jezdez
19:50 ericflo
jezdez: Ooh, no I didn't
19:50 jezdez
or the api in general
19:50 ericflo
jezdez: I looked at the API for getting profile images, but apparently there's no way to do that
19:51 Alex_Gaynor
jezdez: integration with hurl ftfw
19:51 jezdez
for the fucking win?
19:51 Alex_Gaynor
yep
19:52 Alex_Gaynor
oh hey we're in -sprint
19:52 ericflo
:)
19:55 daniellindsley waves from #django-sprint.
20:39 Alex_Gaynor
carljm: why do you use paranthesis for tuple unpacking?
20:40 carljm
Alex_Gaynor: good question. makes me feel warm and Lisp-fuzzy?
20:40 Alex_Gaynor
heh
20:41 carljm
wait. where do i even do that?
20:42 Alex_Gaynor
carljm: first line of your diff
20:42 Alex_Gaynor
on 6191
20:42 carljm
indeed, i see it
20:42 carljm
would you like me to fix that for you? does it make you sad?
20:42 Alex_Gaynor
:D yes
20:43 Alex_Gaynor is easily saddened apparently
20:43 carljm
heh
21:18 Alex_Gaynor
jkocherhans: patch uploaded for #10216
21:18 DjangoBot
22:00 jkocherhans
Alex_Gaynor: any thoughts on whether or not to backport r12586 ?
22:00 DjangoBot
22:04 Alex_Gaynor
jkocherhans: Hrm...
22:05 jkocherhans
doesn't seem like it would hurt, but it also doesn't seem like it should go into a minor release, cause it might, for someone doing something crazy
22:05 Alex_Gaynor
i'm fine with not backporitng
22:06 jkocherhans
I think I am too. can always do it later I guess.
22:27 ericflo
I present this with no commentary ---> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wouG4GpL1-I
22:28 jezdez
O_O
22:29 jezdez implodes
22:30 daniellindsley
Wow.
22:30 jbronn
we need to get those costumes for jacob & ubernostrum
22:31 jezdez
LMAO
22:33 Alex_Gaynor
jbronn: I'd say we should get them for adrian, but he doens't like the pony

Feb. 25th, 2010

01:14 ericholscher
hudson moved onto port 80 now
01:14 ericholscher
and we have mysql/sqlite/postgres builds going on solaris and ubuntu
01:16 Alex_Gaynor
ericholscher: hows our python version coverage?
01:16 ericholscher
2.5 and 2.6
01:16 Alex_Gaynor
be nice to get 2.4
01:16 ericholscher
totally
01:17 ericholscher
the solaris boxes have 2.4, but no dependencies on them
01:17 ericholscher
added a 2.4 on solaris, gunna see if i can get it working
01:23 ericholscher
ugh
01:23 ericholscher
sqlite errors
01:23 ericholscher
i want to fix that like a box of hornets
01:55 ericholscher
woo
02:21 SmileyChris
freakboy3742: you round?
02:23 freakboy3742
SmileyChris: I am -
02:23 freakboy3742
but I'm at work, so I might get called out in a bit
02:23 SmileyChris
reading the discussion in #10975, there are two issues here
02:23 DjangoBot
02:23 SmileyChris
i don't want to get into the whole inheritance discussion
02:23 SmileyChris
so that's the first issue which i'm sidestepping
02:23 SmileyChris
but there is a valid issue (which #6510 addresses)
02:23 DjangoBot
02:24 SmileyChris
i kinda hijacked that ticket and should probably have just made a new one
02:24 SmileyChris
but the gist of it is, that IfEqualNode is missing a get_nodes_by_type method
02:24 SmileyChris
6510 also nicely abstracts out this method (in a backwards compatible way)
02:25 SmileyChris
but if that's too much of a feature request, we should at least just fix the damn IfEqualNode, which has been wrong for 2 years now
02:25 ericholscher
Alex_Gaynor, got that 2.4 sqlite going at least on the solaris box
02:26 Alex_Gaynor
ericholscher: nice
02:26 Alex_Gaynor
SmileyChris: should we rewrite IfEqualNode in terms of IfNode now?
02:26 freakboy3742
SmileyChris: Agreed that the inconsistency between ifequal and if should be fixed
02:27 freakboy3742
SmileyChris: Sorry - I'm getting pinged by work
02:27 SmileyChris
np
02:27 SmileyChris
Alex_Gaynor: seems a bit code churnish
02:28 freakboy3742
If you can get your thoughts into a single block in an email on django-dev, I'll try and take a look this evening
02:28 Alex_Gaynor
freakboy3742: I had a patch to fix one of the select_related issues that jkocherhans wanted to punt to you, it's marked as RFC
02:29 freakboy3742
Alex_Gaynor: Ticket number?
02:29 Alex_Gaynor

March 6th, 2010

15:57 nessita
hello everyone
17:37 nessita
hi jkocherhans, how are you? :-)
17:37 jkocherhans
nessita: I'm good. how about you?
17:38 nessita
jkocherhans: fine, thanks. Enjoyin the hot weather here (not!)
20:05 nessita
jkocherhans: did you have any chance to digg deeper in #12749?
20:05 DjangoBot
20:06 jkocherhans
nessita: nope. I'll put that on my list to look at today.
20:07 nessita
jkocherhans: if I can help in any way, let me know
21:20 matiasb
if reviewers available, #13041 and #12247 were updated
21:20 DjangoBot
21:21 DjangoBot
21:51 jkocherhans
matiasb: if you can't reproduce something, feel free to close a ticket as worksforme and ask the reporter to supply additional information if they have any. looks like that's the case for #13041. Looking at #12247 now.
21:51 DjangoBot
21:51 DjangoBot
21:52 matiasb
jkocherhans: ok, got it; thanks
22:21 jkocherhans
matiasb: I think #12247 looks pretty good, though I'm worried that calling pk__in=[] seems to be including everything instead of nothing... so the bug might be even deeper in the code for __in, but I'm not sure about that yet. you've definitely narrowed down the problem though. thanks.
22:21 DjangoBot
22:22 matiasb
hmm... ok
22:22 matiasb
maybe I take a look later, I'm leaving now; thanks for the review
22:23 matiasb
see you guys!