#django-sprint
Feb. 24th, 2010
| 19:39 | Alex_Gaynor | daniellindsley: this is what ericflo did while we were kill -9ing zombies |
| 19:40 | matt_c | overachiever. |
| 19:40 | daniellindsley thinks the code looks pretty decent. | |
| 19:41 | daniellindsley | Kinda jealous even. |
| 19:42 | ericflo | no stealing my bitbucket session key :) |
| 19:42 | ericflo | (we hard-coded that because they cache feeds for anonymous users for 15 mins) |
| 19:48 | jezdez | hah! |
| 19:48 | Alex_Gaynor | c-c-c-cahing fail |
| 19:50 | jezdez | ericflo: you know about http://api.bitbucket.org/1.0/doc/changesets/? |
| 19:50 | ericflo | jezdez: Ooh, no I didn't |
| 19:50 | jezdez | or the api in general |
| 19:50 | ericflo | jezdez: I looked at the API for getting profile images, but apparently there's no way to do that |
| 19:51 | Alex_Gaynor | jezdez: integration with hurl ftfw |
| 19:51 | jezdez | for the fucking win? |
| 19:51 | Alex_Gaynor | yep |
| 19:52 | Alex_Gaynor | oh hey we're in -sprint |
| 19:52 | ericflo | :) |
| 19:55 | daniellindsley waves from #django-sprint. | |
| 20:39 | Alex_Gaynor | carljm: why do you use paranthesis for tuple unpacking? |
| 20:40 | carljm | Alex_Gaynor: good question. makes me feel warm and Lisp-fuzzy? |
| 20:40 | Alex_Gaynor | heh |
| 20:41 | carljm | wait. where do i even do that? |
| 20:42 | Alex_Gaynor | carljm: first line of your diff |
| 20:42 | Alex_Gaynor | on 6191 |
| 20:42 | carljm | indeed, i see it |
| 20:42 | carljm | would you like me to fix that for you? does it make you sad? |
| 20:42 | Alex_Gaynor | :D yes |
| 20:43 | Alex_Gaynor is easily saddened apparently | |
| 20:43 | carljm | heh |
| 21:18 | Alex_Gaynor | jkocherhans: patch uploaded for #10216 |
| 21:18 | DjangoBot | |
| 22:00 | jkocherhans | Alex_Gaynor: any thoughts on whether or not to backport r12586 ? |
| 22:00 | DjangoBot | |
| 22:04 | Alex_Gaynor | jkocherhans: Hrm... |
| 22:05 | jkocherhans | doesn't seem like it would hurt, but it also doesn't seem like it should go into a minor release, cause it might, for someone doing something crazy |
| 22:05 | Alex_Gaynor | i'm fine with not backporitng |
| 22:06 | jkocherhans | I think I am too. can always do it later I guess. |
| 22:27 | ericflo | I present this with no commentary ---> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wouG4GpL1-I |
| 22:28 | jezdez | O_O |
| 22:29 | jezdez implodes | |
| 22:30 | daniellindsley | Wow. |
| 22:30 | jbronn | we need to get those costumes for jacob & ubernostrum |
| 22:31 | jezdez | LMAO |
| 22:33 | Alex_Gaynor | jbronn: I'd say we should get them for adrian, but he doens't like the pony |
Feb. 25th, 2010
| 01:14 | ericholscher | hudson moved onto port 80 now |
| 01:14 | ericholscher | and we have mysql/sqlite/postgres builds going on solaris and ubuntu |
| 01:16 | Alex_Gaynor | ericholscher: hows our python version coverage? |
| 01:16 | ericholscher | 2.5 and 2.6 |
| 01:16 | Alex_Gaynor | be nice to get 2.4 |
| 01:16 | ericholscher | totally |
| 01:17 | ericholscher | the solaris boxes have 2.4, but no dependencies on them |
| 01:17 | ericholscher | added a 2.4 on solaris, gunna see if i can get it working |
| 01:23 | ericholscher | ugh |
| 01:23 | ericholscher | sqlite errors |
| 01:23 | ericholscher | i want to fix that like a box of hornets |
| 01:55 | ericholscher | woo |
| 02:21 | SmileyChris | freakboy3742: you round? |
| 02:23 | freakboy3742 | SmileyChris: I am - |
| 02:23 | freakboy3742 | but I'm at work, so I might get called out in a bit |
| 02:23 | SmileyChris | reading the discussion in #10975, there are two issues here |
| 02:23 | DjangoBot | |
| 02:23 | SmileyChris | i don't want to get into the whole inheritance discussion |
| 02:23 | SmileyChris | so that's the first issue which i'm sidestepping |
| 02:23 | SmileyChris | but there is a valid issue (which #6510 addresses) |
| 02:23 | DjangoBot | |
| 02:24 | SmileyChris | i kinda hijacked that ticket and should probably have just made a new one |
| 02:24 | SmileyChris | but the gist of it is, that IfEqualNode is missing a get_nodes_by_type method |
| 02:24 | SmileyChris | 6510 also nicely abstracts out this method (in a backwards compatible way) |
| 02:25 | SmileyChris | but if that's too much of a feature request, we should at least just fix the damn IfEqualNode, which has been wrong for 2 years now |
| 02:25 | ericholscher | Alex_Gaynor, got that 2.4 sqlite going at least on the solaris box |
| 02:26 | Alex_Gaynor | ericholscher: nice |
| 02:26 | Alex_Gaynor | SmileyChris: should we rewrite IfEqualNode in terms of IfNode now? |
| 02:26 | freakboy3742 | SmileyChris: Agreed that the inconsistency between ifequal and if should be fixed |
| 02:27 | freakboy3742 | SmileyChris: Sorry - I'm getting pinged by work |
| 02:27 | SmileyChris | np |
| 02:27 | SmileyChris | Alex_Gaynor: seems a bit code churnish |
| 02:28 | freakboy3742 | If you can get your thoughts into a single block in an email on django-dev, I'll try and take a look this evening |
| 02:28 | Alex_Gaynor | freakboy3742: I had a patch to fix one of the select_related issues that jkocherhans wanted to punt to you, it's marked as RFC |
| 02:29 | freakboy3742 | Alex_Gaynor: Ticket number? |
| 02:29 | Alex_Gaynor |
March 6th, 2010
| 15:57 | nessita | hello everyone |
| 17:37 | nessita | hi jkocherhans, how are you? :-) |
| 17:37 | jkocherhans | nessita: I'm good. how about you? |
| 17:38 | nessita | jkocherhans: fine, thanks. Enjoyin the hot weather here (not!) |
| 20:05 | nessita | jkocherhans: did you have any chance to digg deeper in #12749? |
| 20:05 | DjangoBot | |
| 20:06 | jkocherhans | nessita: nope. I'll put that on my list to look at today. |
| 20:07 | nessita | jkocherhans: if I can help in any way, let me know |
| 21:20 | matiasb | if reviewers available, #13041 and #12247 were updated |
| 21:20 | DjangoBot | |
| 21:21 | DjangoBot | |
| 21:51 | jkocherhans | matiasb: if you can't reproduce something, feel free to close a ticket as worksforme and ask the reporter to supply additional information if they have any. looks like that's the case for #13041. Looking at #12247 now. |
| 21:51 | DjangoBot | |
| 21:51 | DjangoBot | |
| 21:52 | matiasb | jkocherhans: ok, got it; thanks |
| 22:21 | jkocherhans | matiasb: I think #12247 looks pretty good, though I'm worried that calling pk__in=[] seems to be including everything instead of nothing... so the bug might be even deeper in the code for __in, but I'm not sure about that yet. you've definitely narrowed down the problem though. thanks. |
| 22:21 | DjangoBot | |
| 22:22 | matiasb | hmm... ok |
| 22:22 | matiasb | maybe I take a look later, I'm leaving now; thanks for the review |
| 22:23 | matiasb | see you guys! |