2008-6-30
| 00:01 | cramm | sakyamuni: http://dpaste.com/59846/ |
| 00:01 | cramm | that's what I'm getting |
| 00:03 | sakyamuni | that is what it does for sqlite it seems, I am using postgres and DATABASE_NAME just gives me the regular DB name. I'll dig further hmm |
| 00:14 | cramm | sakyamuni: the test suite des use the 'regular' database you've specified with DATABASE_NAME in your setting.py |
| 00:16 | cramm | *does |
| 00:17 | sakyamuni | cramm: when i start the test suite it creates a test_dbname database so I figured it used that one. |
| 00:19 | sakyamuni | I will just work around this by assuming the db name is 'test_'+settings.DATABASE_NAME for now. |
| 00:22 | cramm | oh sorry, you're right. I had forgot about the test_ prefix thing |
| 04:32 | paltman | for anyone who might be interested i got the patch for ticket #4667 (edit inline support for generic relations in nfa) working. there is a write up of what i did in this blog post: http://paltman.com/2008/06/29/edit-inline-suppo... |
| 04:32 | DjangoBot | |
| 07:08 | is_null | hello everybody, i don't understand how to clone --bare with only one sub-directory. Any tip please? I checked man git-clone |
| 07:10 | is_null | sorry, wrong channel nevermind |
| 10:33 | david`bgk | it seems there is a useless import of wraps in contrib.auth.decorators, someone confirms before I fill a ticket? |
| 10:41 | jezdez | david`bgk: yep, that seems to be unused |
| 10:43 | trbs | humn shouldn't wraps be used in the decorators ? |
| 10:44 | trbs | user_passes_test and login_required to wrap the decorated functions attributes |
| 10:47 | david`bgk | I can't find any reference to that, update_wrapper is used but not wraps |
| 10:48 | trbs | in the rest of django's decorators wraps is used in the decorators as : return wraps(view_func)(decorate) |
| 10:49 | trbs | i think this is also what should be the case in contrib.auth.decorators |
| 12:01 | cramm | david`bgk: Hi, can you remeber if the test suite failure you werre seeing on Mac OS X is this one?: http://code.djangoproject.com/wiki/DjangoOnWind... |
| 12:34 | david`bgk | cramm, it looks exactly the same: http://dpaste.com/59930/ |
| 12:36 | cramm | david`bgk: could you give me details about (OS, python, setuptools) version, python distribution so I can add them to that page? |
| 12:40 | david`bgk | of course, osx leopard, python 2.5.1 |
| 12:40 | david`bgk | mmmh where can I find setuptools informations? |
| 12:48 | cramm | david`bgk: hmm, on Debian and on Windows it's a package installable separately from Python |
| 12:51 | david`bgk | cramm, 0.6c8 for setuptools |
| 12:52 | cramm | david`bgk: thanks |
| 14:23 | telenieko | freakboy3742: FYI, in Spain Mark is spelled Marc with C ;)) (for r7805) but no worries :) |
| 14:23 | DjangoBot | |
| 14:44 | telenieko | mm.. r7770 says nfa is merged up to r7766, but it does not have the changes introduced in r7724, any clue? |
| 14:44 | DjangoBot | |
| 14:44 | DjangoBot | |
| 14:44 | DjangoBot | |
| 15:01 | SimonW | I have a suggestion for fixing AlreadyRegistered in newforms-admin - anyone awake who cares to hear it? |
| 15:01 | cramm | telenieko: seems like a manual merge was needed and the hunk slipped from the eyes because on nf-a there is a SiteAdmin class definition between Site and RequestSite |
| 15:02 | cramm | *from the eyes of brosner |
| 15:02 | telenieko | cramm: I saw it, maybe it conflicted during merge, I'll try to ping brosner later if he gets around, thanks ;) |
| 15:06 | jkocherhans | SimonW: yes, please. unless you want to wait until some more people show up. |
| 15:06 | empty | SimonW: did you see the discussion on Django-dev about this a while back? |
| 15:07 | SimonW | empty: I think so, can't remember the details |
| 15:07 | SimonW | here's the solution: allow people to register the same model more than once, BUT force them to specify the URL when they do so |
| 15:07 | empty | |
| 15:07 | empty | I can't remember either. :D |
| 15:07 | SimonW | there's a very good use case for having a model registered multiple times |
| 15:08 | SimonW | say I have one model, but I want user type A to have one set of customisations when they edit it, and user type B to have another set of customisations |
| 15:08 | SimonW | easiest way to do that would be to write two different custom ModelAdmin classes |
| 15:08 | SimonW | and register it twice at two different URLs |
| 15:08 | SimonW | : /admin/categories-for-superusers/ and /admin/categories-for-regular-users/ for example |
| 15:09 | SimonW | admin.site.register(Category, SuperUserCategoryAdmin, slug="categories-for-superusers") |
| 15:09 | SimonW | admin.site.register(Category, RegularUserCategoryAdmin, slug="categories-for-regular-users") |
| 15:09 | SimonW | if you only register something once there's no need to pass the optional slug="" argument |
| 15:09 | SimonW | and everything works exactly the same as it does now |
| 15:10 | SimonW | if you try to register a model twice and /don't/ provide the slug="" argument on the second attempt, you get an exception |
| 15:10 | SimonW | anything crazy about that? if not I'll write it up for the mailing list and investigate how hard it would be to actually implement |
| 15:10 | jkocherhans | I can see the benefit in that. I've written a few ModelAdmin classes that had 3 or 4 branches for just about every authorization method. |
| 15:12 | jkocherhans | I don't love putting the slug in the registration, but I guess ModelAdmin is already handling dispatch, so I can't think of a *real* reason not to like it. |
| 15:53 | brosner | telenieko: r7730 |
| 15:53 | DjangoBot | |
| 15:55 | telenieko | mm. thanks brosner, something's wrong in my git then :) |
| 15:56 | telenieko just noticed he didn't have nfa updated on git :o | |
| 15:56 | telenieko | brosner: I'm changing nfa auth tests L23 |
| 15:56 | brosner | i already fixed that |
| 15:56 | telenieko | another effect of not having svn up-to-date, agh! |
| 15:57 | telenieko | luckyly it was a simple thing |
| 15:57 | telenieko | thanks ;) |
| 15:57 | brosner | i just removed the nfa tests in favor of the trunk ones |
| 15:57 | brosner | they were doing the same thing |
| 16:00 | SimonW | brosner - did you see our recent discussion about AlreadyRegistered ? Check channel logs from about an hour ago |
| 16:01 | brosner | SimonW: yeah i did. one second and i'll get back to you :) |
| 16:01 | brosner | actually a bit longer than a second. going into a meeting ;) |
| 16:04 | SimonW | I'm about to head for a train, probably be back online in half an hour or so |