2008-6-24
| 00:16 | cramm | t |
| 15:58 | cramm watches in awe the 'alpha eggs' on the code_swarm animation | |
| 16:43 | telenieko | Hi all, on #7521 should r7726 be considered a fix or a temporary workaround? (The fix done would mean: contrib apps cannot test their views) |
| 16:43 | DjangoBot | |
| 16:43 | DjangoBot | |
| 16:44 | Alex_Gaynor | I think NFA already has a similar test case that works fine |
| 16:45 | telenieko | The issue that raised r7726 is that, if a contrib app has a urls.py in which tests rely, if you are not including this urls.py on you project when you run tests they'll fail because of contrib's. |
| 16:45 | DjangoBot | |
| 16:46 | telenieko | So either manage.py test should not run the contrib app tests ( seems reasonable, as manage.py test does not run the whole testsuite either) or we find a way to include those urls.py ;) |
| 16:47 | telenieko | NFA does have similar tests. but those don't tests the views, only the forms |
| 16:51 | telenieko | I have to setup an IRC bouncer ;) |
| 16:52 | korpios | I just need to announce to the Django world ... that I **love** signals. I do. I'm infatuated. |
| 17:49 | telenieko | jacobkm: do you know trac won't send e-mails when a ticket is closed with the svn commit hook? |
| 17:57 | jacobkm | telenieko: that's silly |
| 17:59 | telenieko | jacobkm: not exactly, if trac does not mail you, you won't notice a ticket you have some interest in was closed unless you keep your eyes close to the timeline or check the ticket itself ;) |
| 17:59 | jacobkm | telenieko: yeah, I agree - I mean Trac not doing that is silly. I wonder why that is? |
| 17:59 | telenieko | No idea, just noticed it when I went to take a look at #7521 and found it closed! ;) |
| 17:59 | DjangoBot | |
| 18:00 | telenieko | But there's a ticket in TRAC's trac about this ;) |
| 18:00 | Alex_Gaynor | How will they know when it's closed!?!?\ |
| 18:01 | telenieko | http://trac.edgewall.org/ticket/950 < this one, but hey say it's fixed Maybe our post_commit_hook is outdated? |
| 18:01 | jacobkm | could be |
| 18:02 | telenieko | The patch attached seems to, at least, try to notify about changes ;) |
| 18:21 | telenieko | jacobkm: (git) have you checked if you can pull from somebody, and commit merged/cherry-picked changes? that'll be nice on sprints hehe ;) |
| 18:21 | jacobkm | telenieko: yeah, I can. |
| 18:21 | telenieko | good to know :) |
| 18:22 | jacobkm | I still kinda prefer patches since they make the code easier to review. |
| 18:23 | jacobkm | If there was something like git add --patch for cherry-pick that would be awesome, but I really like being able to review the patch as I apply it. |
| 18:24 | telenieko | You can "git cherry-pick -n <some commit>" and have it applied as if you ran "patch -p1 <...." then you can git diff as usual to review the code. Later a git diff <some_remote_branch> would show you what's still pending from this remote |
| 18:25 | telenieko | even "git merge --no-commit --squash some_remote/branch" can do the job if there's not too much to merge. I prefer cherry-pick anyway |
| 18:25 | telenieko | I think you're looking for cherry-pick ;) |
| 18:33 | jacobkm | telenieko: ah, -n is the flag I wanted |
| 18:33 | jacobkm | axiak: you around? I have a question about #2070. |
| 18:33 | DjangoBot | |
| 18:33 | telenieko | jacobkm: glad to know this helped you, you'll need a spare "n" key for your keyboard then :) "git cherry -v <some branch>" may also be usefull ;) |
| 18:35 | telenieko | who operated django-developers ? |
| 18:35 | telenieko | s/operated/operates/ |
| 18:36 | empty | telenieko: the mailing list or the channel? |
| 18:36 | empty | well jacobkm would be for both really. :D |
| 18:36 | telenieko | empty: mailling list ;) |
| 18:37 | telenieko | then, jacobkm, everytime I post to django-developers I get a bounce for mail<somedigits>@vodafone.nl, is google not handling bounces, vodafone being silly or it's just me having something broken? |
| 18:37 | jacobkm | telenieko: yeah, I'm getting that too, and it's really strange because that address isn't actually subscribed to the list. I think someone's forwarding on the message, which is bouncing and sending the bounce to the wrong place. |
| 18:39 | telenieko | jacobkm: yes, the forwarder is vahatitest at gmail dot com |
| 18:40 | jacobkm | telenieko: oh, nice eyes. |
| 18:40 | telenieko | mail headers are plenty of useful information, that bounce took 13 jumps to reach destination :) |
| 18:42 | jacobkm | I saw those 13 hops and just gave up :P |
| 18:43 | telenieko | Oh, you should have started from the bottom, 6th for me, maybe 5th/4th for you ;) |
| 20:04 | Harkins | Hey, minor doc bug: http://www.djangoproject.com/documentation/unic... has broken links to 0.96 and 0.95 versions. I'd submit a ticket, but Trac says it's rejecting my spam when I try. |
| 21:24 | scotfl | jacobkm: Sounds like you want git-format-patch and git-am. That way people can send you patch-files rather than pull requests. |
| 21:25 | jacobkm | scotfl: yes, that's extremely nice, too. Though git-am needs an mbox file and I've not seen one of those in years. |
| 21:25 | jacobkm | "Every software program evolves until it can read email." |
| 21:28 | scotfl | jacobkm: The g-f-p output is a "mbox" file with just one message in it. mbox is just concatenated text files after all. :) |
| 21:38 | donspaulding thinks of all his apps that are able to check email. shudders. | |