2010-2-17
| 17:05 | asksol | the exact time requirement is not implemented yet |
| 17:06 | asksol | I've mentioned before it shouldn't be that hard to do |
| 17:06 | asksol | you just need a way to convert strings like "3:00" to a datetime object |
| 17:07 | asksol | I would be happy if you could implement that :) |
| 17:07 | asksol | there's probably a library around to do that |
| 17:07 | asksol | then you have to make a PeriodicTask that executes on a fixed time instead of on an interval |
| 17:08 | underseapilot | w00t! i think this works! |
| 17:08 | asksol | underseapilot: awesome! |
| 17:08 | asksol | i'm sensing a 1.0.1 release |
| 17:12 | asksol | underseapilot: It works with the HUP signal as well |
| 17:16 | asksol | underseapilot: please verify HUP, and close http://github.com/ask/celery/issues#issue/68 if it works |
| 17:17 | underseapilot | will do, though might not finish testing till tomorrow. |
| 17:18 | asksol | sure |
| 17:18 | asksol | will probably have to test these changes for a few days |
| 17:19 | underseapilot | exactly. |
| 17:22 | asksol | luckily no one is processing credit card transactions with celery, yet |
| 17:22 | asksol | :) |
| 17:22 | asksol | or, I hope :/ |
| 17:25 | asksol | the plan is to be robust enough to be able to do that, so we definitely need some functional tests of the kind you're writing |
| 17:25 | underseapilot | agreed. though not sure how i'm gonna do that yet. :) |
| 17:25 | underseapilot | internally we fire up a celeryd and test against that. |
| 17:26 | asksol | maybe use the worker_ready signal to tell when the worker has started |
| 17:26 | asksol | and the task_received signal to know the task has been received |
| 17:26 | asksol | and I'll add any additional signals you need |
| 17:27 | asksol | or maybe using events |
| 17:27 | underseapilot | but it's okay to fire up a Worker in another process? ( know how, but seems different than the other tests ) |
| 17:27 | asksol | alternative is to start worker -> send task -> hopefully sleep long enough before you shut down |
| 17:28 | asksol | you should do it via exec() then |
| 17:28 | asksol | not using multiprocessing |
| 17:28 | asksol | or, that is, not using fork() |
| 17:28 | asksol | because multiprocessing has some bugs lurking around that path |
| 17:29 | underseapilot | ok |
| 17:45 | underseapilot | asksol, this change http://github.com/ask/celery/commit/fa0a4d4763f... relies on current_process() from multiprocessing |
| 17:45 | underseapilot | and looks like the second call isn't fully qualified. |
| 17:56 | rlotun | hi all - wondering if there was support for scheduled tasks (not PeriodicTasks, but one-off future tasks) |
| 17:58 | padt | rlotun: there's an eta kwarg for tasks |
| 17:59 | padt | |
| 18:01 | rlotun | padt: brilliant, thanks! |
| 18:01 | padt | np |
| 18:01 | rlotun | padt: I also sent an email to the google group but realized it might be faster to come here first, so ignore the double question ;-) |
| 18:02 | padt | heh. good thinking |
| 18:02 | padt | usually depends on the time of day if it's something Ask has to answer. We're in cet+1 |
| 18:03 | rlotun | you work for Opera too? |
| 18:04 | padt | yeah. Not on the same stuff though. I'm just the pedant that goes through the docs every once in a while |
| 18:06 | rlotun | that's cool. I work at a small startup in London called TweetDeck. celery is perfect for our needs and it's great that it exists. |
| 18:08 | padt | that's the adobe air thingy? I think I tried that one |
| 18:08 | padt | the adobe runtime was a bit iffy on linux at the time unfortunately |
| 18:08 | rlotun | yeah, though we also have an iphone client and others in the works |
| 18:08 | rlotun | you might want to give it another spin, I think those issues have been fixed ;-) |
| 18:09 | padt | cool |
| 18:09 | padt | at the moment I share an office with the guy that maintains the opera twitter widget though, so we'll see :) |
| 18:09 | padt | come to think of it, I think I have a t shirt even. Was there a tweetdeck one from startupswag? |
| 18:10 | rlotun | yeah actually |
| 18:12 | padt | Then I've probably advertized for you guys in the office! |
| 18:13 | rlotun | awesome! we can send more, and some tweeting birds too if you'd like ;-) |
| 18:13 | rlotun | you should definitely give us a shout if you're ever in London |
| 18:15 | padt | Cool. Will do |
| 18:18 | harel | asksol: looking at the eta arg.. .i go down the path and see it end up in TaskPublisher, where its sent as part of message_data to the carrot Publisher. ... |
| 18:18 | harel | not sure what is missing then... |
| 18:19 | harel | could it be covertly implemented already? |
| 18:25 | harel | asksol: gotta go feed my boys before they devour the furniture. let me know about eta (not the Basque separatists, you know the one i mean) |
| 20:01 | bartek- | Hi there. I just got celery working great with Django and now I want to deploy it on some production sites. I want to know the best approach to this. I use virtualenv's for my sites on production, should I install seperate celery packages and run separate instances of it for each website, or am I better off to just run a single one and install the package under the root python install? |
| 20:11 | bartek- | Ooh, I guess one issue I just encountered is that celery doesn't seem to be respecting it's default max_retries of 3 .. Mine has retried 7 times now. I can paste some code . if someone is alive :- ) |
| 20:40 | bartek- | Oh, I need to learn more about RabbitMQ (I bookarked asksol's article he linked!) .. it seems after restarting my rabbitmq-server, it's smoother now. Looks like I had a bunch of instances "caught up" from all my testing. |
| 20:51 | bartek- | Hmm, it still keeps retrying infinietly. |
| 20:52 | bartek- | infinitely* |
| 20:54 | underseapilot | bartek- maybe you want to start celeryd with --discard once? |
| 21:13 | bartek- | man im in a totally different world of programming when you can restart a service and it fires off the backlog it had |
| 21:13 | bartek- | awesome :) |
| 22:08 | donspaulding | Still trying to get celery to run tasks on Windows. celeryd's logging tells me the taskpool gets created, but the task never completes. Working off a test script that asksol gave me yesterday, here's my current traceback. Does anyone know what's going on here? http://pastie.org/829783 |
| 22:12 | underseapilot | is that really the same file? b/c the traceback references line number that don't exist. |
| 22:27 | asksol | use x.apply_async(MicrParse(), ...) in that case |
| 22:27 | asksol | you're using the class as Target, so calling it means MicrParse.__new__(3) |
| 22:28 | asksol | so you have to instantiate it to make it use MicrParse.__call__(3) |
| 22:28 | asksol | urm. MicrParse().__call__(3) |
| 22:28 | asksol | but I think celery.loaders.detect_loader is the source of your problem |
| 22:29 | asksol | the real problem that is, the __new__ error is just because the test script is wrong |
| 22:29 | asksol | donspaulding: do you use "project.settings" as settings module? |
| 22:31 | donspaulding | underseapilot: not the same file, but the error is the same with the file I pasted. Nice catch ;-) |
| 22:31 | donspaulding | asksol: yes |
| 22:34 | donspaulding | asksol: changing it to MicrParse() gets me further. Now I've got an exception in my run(), will fix that before continuing the test. |
| 22:36 | asksol | donspaulding: don't use project.settings ;) |
| 22:36 | asksol | that's the bug |
| 22:36 | asksol | there's an issue about it at github |
| 22:38 | asksol | make celeryd cd into the project dir maybe |
| 22:38 | asksol | |
| 22:42 | donspaulding | asksol: yeah, I read through that bug when you pasted it yesterday, I'm just not smart enough to see it. |
| 22:43 | donspaulding | here's my most recent exception http://pastie.org/829783 |
| 22:43 | donspaulding | underseapilot: and yes, those are the actual files, unmodified ;-) |
| 22:44 | underseapilot | donspaulding, very good then. ;) |
| 22:45 | asksol | don't run such a complex task, you can't see the traceback so hard to debug |
| 22:53 | donspaulding | asksol: a simpler task succeeds: http://pastie.org/829783 |
| 22:54 | donspaulding | asksol: Am I wasting my time with this test script? |
| 22:54 | donspaulding | asksol: more importantly, am I wasting your time? |
| 23:04 | asksol | there's a bug in your task, I guess |
| 23:05 | asksol | try to run it manually outside the pool (Task.run(...)) |
Page 3 of 3
← Previous
(296 total)